Process Costing
Process costing is a cost accounting method used in industries where goods or services undergo a sequence of continuous, repetitive operations or processes. It is especially valuable when a company produces uniform or standardized items in large quantities. Process costing tracks the costs associated with each stage of production within these continuous processes and assigns those costs to the units produced. This method is crucial for understanding the cost per unit in scenarios where products or services are created through an ongoing and repetitive series of activities.
Process Costing Explained
Imagine a large bakery that produces thousands of loaves of bread daily. In this bakery, the production of bread involves a series of continuous and repetitive operations like mixing, baking, and packaging. Process costing is the ideal way to determine the cost of each loaf of bread in such a setting.
- Continuous Operations: In process costing, the focus is on continuous and identical operations. In our bakery, it's the repeated steps involved in bread production.
- Cost Tracking: The costs are tracked at each stage of the process. This includes the costs of ingredients (flour, yeast, etc.), labor (bakers and packers), and overhead (utilities, factory maintenance).
- Cost Allocation: At the end of a specific time period, such as a day or a month, the total cost incurred during that period is divided by the total number of units produced. For our bakery, this means calculating the cost per loaf of bread produced within that timeframe.
Equivalent Units
Sometimes, not all units are completed at the end of the accounting period. Some might be partially finished, while others are fully completed. To allocate costs correctly, we use the concept of “equivalent units,” which is a way to account for the value of partially completed units.
Example
Let's consider an example in the context of a chocolate manufacturing company. Suppose this company produces chocolate bars, and during a particular accounting period, they have the following production status:
- 10,000 chocolate bars are fully completed and ready for sale.
- 2,000 chocolate bars are in the final packaging stage, where they only need packaging to be considered complete.
- 1,000 chocolate bars are in the process of being molded and shaped but still require the final coating to be fully completed.
To determine the equivalent units, you would calculate as follows:
- The 10,000 fully completed chocolate bars are equivalent to 10,000 units.
- The 2,000 chocolate bars in the final packaging stage are also fully complete in terms of processing, so they are equivalent to 2,000 units.
- For the 1,000 chocolate bars in the molding and shaping stage, you would estimate the equivalent units based on the progress made. Let's say these bars are 60% complete in terms of processing. Therefore, you would calculate 1,000 * 0.60, which equals 600 equivalent units.
So, in this example, you have a total of 10,000 (fully completed) + 2,000 (in final packaging) + 600 (partially completed) equivalent units, which amounts to 12,600 equivalent units. This information is crucial for allocating production costs correctly, especially when determining the cost per equivalent unit for cost accounting purposes.
Process costing is widely used in industries such as food processing, semiconductor manufacturing, pharmaceutical production, and steel fabrication, where products go through multiple stages of processing. It helps businesses understand the cost of production at each step of the process, enabling better decision-making regarding pricing, production optimization, and cost control.
Losses and Incomplete Units
A crucial aspect of process costing involves accounting for losses during production. In our bakery example, it's common for some dough to go to waste, or for loaves to get damaged. These losses can be categorized into two types: normal losses, which are expected and included in the cost of production; and abnormal losses, which are unexpected. Abnormal losses are treated as losses and are typically charged to a separate expense account on the income statement. This is because they are not considered a normal part of the production process. On the other hand, if the normal loss has scrap value, it will be offset against the total cost of production.
In the case of normal loss without value, since there is no value assigned to it, there will be no journal entry; instead, it will be treated as part of the normal production process. However, in the context of normal losses with scrap value, the typical journal entry would involve debiting the "Normal Loss Account" and crediting the "Work-in-Progress Account".
| Account | Debit ($) | Credit ($) |
|---|---|---|
| Normal Loss Account | xxx | |
| Work-in-Progress Account | xxx |
This reflects the recognition of the scrap value associated with normal loss by debiting the "Normal Loss Account" account and reducing the value of "Work-in-Progress Account" by crediting it.
The journal entry for the actual sale of scrap (normal loss) is as follows:
| Account | Debit ($) | Credit ($) |
|---|---|---|
| Cash/Bank | xxx | |
| Normal Loss Account | xxx |
Abnormal losses
In process costing, abnormal losses are viewed as deviations from the regular production process, find their place as losses in a distinct expense account on the income statement. This allocation is made because they are not considered a normal part of the production process, diverging from the expected norms in the production process.
In the case of abnormal loss the typical journal entry would involve debiting the "Abnormal Loss Account" and crediting the "Work-in-Progress Account".
| Account | Debit ($) | Credit ($) |
|---|---|---|
| Abnormal Loss Account | xxx | |
| Work-in-Progress Account | xxx |
The value of a piece of abnormal loss will be equivalent to the value of the good output. In the case of abnormal loss with a monetary value, the scrap value will be subtracted from the total cost of production, and the abnormal loss will be calculated based on the adjusted total cost of production.
The journal entry to transfer the value of abnormal losses to the income statement will be as follows:
| Account | Debit ($) | Credit ($) |
|---|---|---|
| Income Statement | xxx | |
| Abnormal Loss Account | xxx |
Abnormal Gain
Abnormal gain, like abnormal loss, refers to deviations from the regular production process but in a favorable way. It occurs when the actual output exceeds the expected or normal output. These gains are not part of the regular production process and are treated separately. The typical scenario for abnormal gain is an increase in production efficiency, reduced wastage, or any other positive deviation from the expected norms.
When accounting for abnormal gains, the journal entry is made to recognize the gain and transfer its value to the income statement. The typical journal entry involves debiting the "Work-in-Progress Account" and crediting the "Abnormal Gain Account."
The value of a piece of abnormal gain is determined by dividing the total cost of production (minus the scrap value of normal loss, if applicable) to the normal expected level of output.
Abnormal Gain Example
Assume a company's normal expected production of a certain product is 1,000 units. The total cost of production for these 1,000 units is $50,000. Additionally, there is an expected normal loss of 100 units, each with a scrap value of $2.
Now, due to increased efficiency, the company produces 930 units instead of the expected 900 units. In this case, the abnormal gain is 30 units, and the normal loss is 70 instead of 100.
Recognition of Abnormal Gain:
First we need to establish the cost per unit as follows:
Cost Per Unit = (Total Cost of Production−Scrap Value of Expected Normal Loss) / Normal Expected Level of Output
Cost Per Unit = ($50,000−($2*100)) / 900
Cost Per Unit = ($50,000−$200) / 900
Cost Per Unit = $49,800 / 900
Cost Per Unit = $55.33
Once the cost per unit is established, the abnormal gain value will be calculated as follows:
Abnormal Gain Value = Cost Per Unit * Abnormal Gain
Abnormal Gain Value = $55.33 * 30
Abnormal Gain Value = $1,659.90
Now, the journal entry to recognize the abnormal gain will be as follows:
| Account | Debit ($) | Credit ($) |
|---|---|---|
| Work-in-Progress Account (30*55.33) | $1,659.90 | |
| Abnormal Gain Account | $1,659.90 |
Recording the Scrap Value lost:
Given the presence of 30 units of abnormal gain, it implies a corresponding loss in scrap value for these units. This loss will be recognized as follows:
| Account | Debit ($) | Credit ($) |
|---|---|---|
| Abnormal Gain Account (30*2) | $60 | |
| Normal Loss Account (Scrap Value lost) (30*2) | $60 |
Transfer to Income Statement:
The journal entry to transfer the abnormal gain value to the income statement will be as follows:
| Account | Debit ($) | Credit ($) |
|---|---|---|
| Abnormal Gain Account ($1,659.90 - $60) | $1,599.90 | |
| Income Statement | $1,599.90 |
In summary, abnormal gains are treated by recognizing them in a separate account ("Abnormal Gain Account") initially. Subsequently, their value is transferred to the income statement to reflect the positive impact on the overall financial performance of the business.
Joint Product and Process Costing
In process costing, joint products refer to distinct items that emerge from a single production process, each possessing substantial market value. The point at which these products separate is critical, as they can either be sold as is or undergo further processing to enhance their value. Costs incurred up to this separation point need to be allocated among the individual products. The allocation is typically done based on either the physical quantity of each product or their relative sales values.
- Physical Quantity Allocation:
- This method assigns costs based on the volume or weight of each product. For example, if Product A and Product B are joint products, and Product A is twice as heavy as Product B, then Product A would bear a larger share of the joint costs.
- Relative Sales Values Allocation:
- Here, costs are assigned based on the market value of each product. If Product A has a higher market value compared to Product B, it will absorb a greater portion of the joint costs. This method aligns with the economic significance of each product.
Joint Product Example
Consider a manufacturing process that produces joint products, Product A and Product B. These products share common costs up to the separation point, where they become distinct entities.
Scenario:
- Total joint production cost up to the separation point: $10,000
- Physical Quantity:
- Product A: 1,000 units
- Product B: 2,000 units
- Relative Sales Values:
- Product A: $5 per unit
- Product B: $2 per unit
Physical Quantity Allocation:
If we allocate costs based on the physical quantity, the allocation would be proportional to the number of units each product contributes.
- Cost per unit = Total cost / Total units
- Cost per unit = $10,000 / (1,000 units + 2,000 units) = $10,000 / 3,000 units = $3.33 per unit
Now, allocate costs to each product:
- Product A cost = $3.33 per unit * 1,000 units = $3,330
- Product B cost = $3.33 per unit * 2,000 units = $6,660
Relative Sales Values Allocation:
If we allocate costs based on the relative sales values, the allocation would be proportionate to the market value of each product.
- Total Relative Sales Values = (Product A sales value * Quantity) + (Product B sales value * Quantity)
- Total Relative Sales Values = ($5 * 1,000) + ($2 * 2,000) = $5,000 + $4,000 = $9,000
Now, allocate costs to each product:
- Product A share = ($5 * 1,000) / $9,000 * $10,000 = $5,555.56
- Product B share = ($2 * 2,000) / $9,000 * $10,000 = $4,444.44
In this example, the total allocated costs should equal the actual joint production cost of $10,000.
This example illustrates how the choice of allocation method (physical quantity or relative sales values) can lead to different cost allocations for joint products, emphasizing the importance of selecting the method that best reflects the economic reality of the products in question.
Applications Across Industries
Joint product concepts are not confined to a specific industry. In agriculture, where various products arise from a single harvest, or in the oil and gas sector where refining yields multiple products, understanding joint product accounting is crucial. Even in the tech industry, where the development of a software suite might result in different products, the principles of joint product accounting can be applied.
By-product
In process costing, a by-product refers to a secondary output of a production process that, while accompanying the main products, holds minimal sales value. In contrast to joint products, which contribute substantially to a company's revenue, by-products are typically sold at lower prices or in limited quantities, exerting only a marginal impact on the overall sales of the organization. The key distinction lies in their economic significance, where joint products play a significant role in revenue generation, while by-products are considered ancillary outputs. Cost accounting treats these two outputs differently, recognizing the need for specialized approaches due to their varying sales values.
Understanding By-Products:
By-products emerge as additional outcomes during the manufacturing of primary goods. Unlike joint products, which are integral to a company's revenue stream, by-products are often overlooked due to their negligible economic impact. Think of them as the "extra" items that come along for the ride in the production process. The fundamental difference between joint products and by-products lies in their market value—joint products contribute substantially to sales, whereas by-products lack economic significance.
Accounting Approaches:
When it comes to accounting for by-products, there are two primary approaches. The first approach treats the income from by-products as supplementary and adds it to sales in the income statement. This method is straightforward and is suitable for situations where the by-product's contribution is minimal. The second approach subtracts the sales value of the by-product from common processing costs before allocating them among joint products. This method aims to provide a more accurate reflection of the actual costs associated with producing the main products.
Ancillary Outputs with Minimal Sales Value:
By-products are essentially sidekicks in the production process, offering little in terms of sales value compared to the main products. Their role is more ancillary than primary, and businesses often need to decide how to handle them efficiently. While joint products are integral to a company's revenue strategy, by-products are more like companions that tag along without significantly impacting the financial bottom line.
Example:
Let's consider the petroleum industry as a real-world example of by-products in action. In the refining of crude oil, the primary products include gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel, which constitute the major revenue sources. However, the refining process also produces by-products like asphalt and lubricants, which have lower market values compared to the main products. While these by-products might not be the star players, they contribute to the overall efficiency and sustainability of the refining process.
Recognizing the distinction between joint products and by-products allows companies to implement tailored accounting approaches, ensuring accurate financial reporting. By-products might be secondary, but managing them effectively is a key aspect of maximizing overall operational efficiency and profitability in diverse industries.
To summarize, process costing is a vital tool for businesses that engage in continuous and repetitive production processes, allowing them to accurately allocate costs and determine the cost per unit of their products or services, even in situations with losses and incomplete units.
Key takeaways
- Process Costing Basics:
- Ideal for industries with continuous, repetitive production processes.
- Tracks costs across stages, including materials, labor, and overhead.
- Ensures precise cost-per-unit calculation by allocating total costs over units produced.
- Handling Losses:
- Normal Losses: Expected waste included in production costs; scrap value reduces overall cost.
- Abnormal Losses: Unexpected deviations treated separately as expenses.
- Equivalent Units:
- Accounts for partially completed products, ensuring fair cost allocation.
- Abnormal Gains:
- Reflect positive deviations like increased efficiency or reduced wastage, credited separately to highlight improvements.
- Joint Products and By-Products:
- Joint Products: Require cost allocation based on physical quantity or relative sales values.
- By-Products: Secondary outputs with minimal sales value; income can supplement revenue or offset costs.
- Applications Across Industries:
- Widely used in food processing, pharmaceuticals, mining, and technology.
- Facilitates better cost control, pricing strategies, and operational efficiency.
Further Reading:
Absorption Costing and Marginal Costing
Standard Costing
Target Costing
Service Costing
Continuous Costing
Overhead (Indirect Cost) Absorption
Process costing explained
Written by
AB
EthioTax Recruitment
Your next finance role starts here.
Browse 1,000+ diaspora accounting and finance jobs, or register as a candidate and let our team find the right match for you.